3 ms·
"Sick" is a strong word. They're not charities. It would be nice of them to contribute money beyond their taxes to improve the public transit infrastructure, bu
by function_seven 12y ago
"Sick" is a strong word. They're not charities. It would be nice of them to contribute money beyond their taxes to improve the public transit infrastructure, but they are in no way obligated to do so.
The cities, counties, and state should already be improving the infrastructure with the revenue they have.
- sschueller 12y agoThese companies don't pay taxes only the employees do. So giving back in by improving infrastructure would be beneficial to all. I don't think there is a law that forbids privately owned public transportation. They may need to be licences and follow certain laws but that should not stop someone from "disrupting" a broken system.
- frankchn 12y agoThese companies definitely pay property taxes for their buildings to the city/county.