3 ms·
Perhaps the article sloppily meant 25% of all DDR3? The only way this adds up is if you assume a radical contraction of the DDR3 market (Intel currently markets
by thrownaway2424 12y ago
Perhaps the article sloppily meant 25% of all DDR3? The only way this adds up is if you assume a radical contraction of the DDR3 market (Intel currently markets a server processor using DDR4). But that seems like quite a stretch.