3 ms·
The point is that this is a polemic piece, it's Valerie Aurora after all. The opposite of polemics would be apologetics. Valerie is implying that feminism is
by HarryHirsch 12y ago
The point is that this is a polemic piece, it's Valerie Aurora after all. The opposite of polemics would be apologetics. Valerie is implying that feminism is equivalent to civility, civility in the Latin sense of being mindful of the rights and responsibilities to human society.
That's where she loses me.
And what's with this dehumanizing technique of not naming those she disagrees with? You see this often.
- hashbanged 12y agoThey name names, it becomes a radical feminist attack piece. People would ask, why did she attack so and so? They are so nice and do so many things for the community. What's with begging the question by saying "it's Valerlie Aurora after all"? It doesn't do anything for someone reading your comment who doesn't know what to think of her.