3 ms·
And then reflect on the fact that you're still using a joke of a "KDF". SHA256 1001 times? Really? (And it doesn't even so much as have provision for upping the
by nknighthb 12y ago
And then reflect on the fact that you're still using a joke of a "KDF". SHA256 1001 times? Really? (And it doesn't even so much as have provision for upping the number of iterations!)
Like TFA says, don't roll your own crypto. GnuPG exists for a reason.
- bascule 12y agoNot to mention that a large set of keys are known to be reflectively weak under Blowfish: http://iacr.org/archive/fse2007/45930168/45930168.pdf http://iacr.org/archive/fse2007/45930168/45930168.pdf And of course there's ciphertext malleability attacks as it's not using authenticated encryption