3 ms·
>You have the freedom to do anything you want from the result of using this framework. No I do not. >I also have the freedom to do so with what you make Then
by imanaccount247 12y ago
>You have the freedom to do anything you want from the result of using this framework.
No I do not.
>I also have the freedom to do so with what you make
Then clearly I do not have the freedom to do anything I want.
>Why are you so dead set on taking away my freedom
I am taking nothing from you. I release all my code under the ISC license. That is free. Restrictions are not freedom.
>the developers is asking you to share, and share alike.
The developers can ask whatever they like. And I can decline their offer. I will continue to use free software instead. Why is it so upsetting that someone would choose not to use non-free software? If the developers find my absence to be a problem, they are welcome to change make their software free. I have no interest in shareware.
- belorn 12y agoWhile I sincerely doubt that you release all your code under the ISC license, I will take your word on it. That mean you can use any open source license and release your contributions under that license. Be that BSD, GPL, MIT, Apache... what ever it is, your contributions can always be under the license of your choice. So yes, you do have the freedom to do what you claim you only do, ie, release code you write under ISC license. 100% freedom to do exactly that. Write a addon to AGPL and release that add-on as ISC? No legal problem at all. If you want freedom to release code someone else has written under the license of your choice, then I sit in the same boat. I would like too to have the freedom to chose that, but alas, copyright wont' allow that. It would be a neat freedom to chose the license of OS X and windows.
- imanaccount247 12y agoSo, you have no idea what you are talking about, but you want to tell me both what I actually do, and what I should do? Gee, that's really compelling.