3 ms·

I have no specific insight but we stopped being a significant part of the food chain a long time ago, in some relatively miniscule amount of time it'd probably

• namenotrequired 12y ago
  Are you saying we stopped eating?
  • benologist 12y ago
    We stopped being eaten - the only animals that depend on us are domesticated or chickens/cows/etc as another poster mentioned.
• wcoenen 12y ago
  > it'd probably be just like we never existed. Or barely. The Anthropocene would leave a distinct layer in the fossil record. http://www.economist.com/node/18741749 http://www.economist.com/node/18741749
  • benologist 12y ago
    What kind of time frame would be required for that (and all the other evidence) to become uninterpretable - knowing we did exist, but not much more. Is there an amount of time where there'd simply be no evidence at all? Edit: Found this which I guess is our limitation at least, though perhaps not our successors. The oldest known fossils, in fact, are cyanobacteria from Archaean rocks of western Australia, dated 3.5 billion years old. This may be somewhat surprising, since the oldest rocks are only a little older: 3.8 billion years old! Cyanobacteria are among the easiest microfossils to recognize. http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/bacteria/cyanofr.html http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/bacteria/cyanofr.html