3 ms·
>>SIS told The Journal the change was a business move on its part. “The decision to end this contractual relationship was made by SIS as part of its normal busi
by frozenport 12y ago
>>SIS told The Journal the change was a business move on its part. “The decision to end this contractual relationship was made by SIS as part of its normal business operations and then conveyed to Google,” said SIS Chief Financial Officer Tom Seltz in an email.
Um, so who made the choice SIS or Google?
- magicalist 12y agoMaybe it was just the impetus for the change? I'd imagine there's more than one security contractor in silicon valley.
- valas 12y agoIsn't it obvious? SIS cannot force Google to convert some employees to full-time (nor it makes business sense for them).
- raincom 12y agoWho made the choice: Definitely, Google. On the paper, it is SIS. I worked for SIS a decade ago: yes, they are nice folks, they did not provide health insurance. They had some $120/month insurance, which covers like $10K a year--and this is not an insurance at all. That's why I did not buy that insurance. SIS won lots of security contracts based on the price alone. Guardmark, one of its competitors, provides a good health insurance for its employees; but they can't compete with SIS, which does not provide any benefits.