5 ms·
>Not necessarily. Then what? You made the vague statement, make it not vague. >And OCaml has monads, they are just a library like else. And? I did not clai
by imanaccount247 12y ago
>Not necessarily.
Then what? You made the vague statement, make it not vague.
>And OCaml has monads, they are just a library like else.
And? I did not claim ocaml lacks monads. You claimed haskell lacks extensible records. You do understand that my post was a direct reply to what you said right? Not just some random things I felt like saying for no particular reason.