3 ms·
If you want to get radical about it, you can reconfigure your keyboard to a known-efficient configuration such as the Dvorak layout. As you probably know, the Q
by techdog 12y ago
If you want to get radical about it, you can reconfigure your keyboard to a known-efficient configuration such as the Dvorak layout. As you probably know, the QWERTY layout was specifically designed to be un-ergonomic and inefficient (so as to keep typists from jamming the mechanical keys of early typewriters). Dvorak and other layouts are known to be conducive to rapid typing, but your skills would not be transferable across multiple machines.
So it's really a question, first, of whether you intend to stay with QWERTY. If so, I recommend http://www.keybr.com http://www.keybr.com
- mfincham 12y agoIs Dvorak really, scientifically better?
- yzzxy 12y ago> As you probably know, the QWERTY layout was specifically designed to be un-ergonomic and inefficient (so as to keep typists from jamming the mechanical keys of early typewriters) This is false. Please stop repeating it. Dvorak is also not well-proven to be better. http://www.economist.com/node/196071 http://www.economist.com/node/196071