3 ms·
Well, that's not what I'd call an "analysis", and if that's really about the same "worm", it's at least 22 months old, not "new". First submission 2012-11-
by nknighthb 12y ago
Well, that's not what I'd call an "analysis", and if that's really about the same "worm", it's at least 22 months old, not "new".
First submission 2012-11-11 16:21:18 UTC ( 1 year, 10 months ago )
Last submission 2014-05-08 21:33:59 UTC ( 4 months, 3 weeks ago )
Sounds like a small-time vendor trying to make a name for itself by "dissecting" an old trojan. Maybe they want some extra revenue for christmas bonuses.
- techrat 12y agoYet the account mentioned in the article is 2 months old. http://www.reddit.com/user/vtnhiaovyd http://www.reddit.com/user/vtnhiaovyd