5 ms·
I think there should be a centralized tracking system for drones, and each drone should have a unique cryptographic identifier, so you always know who made the
by higherpurpose 12y ago
I think there should be a centralized tracking system for drones, and each drone should have a unique cryptographic identifier, so you always know who made the drone and who owned it.
Then, while you still won't be able to stop assassinations and such, just like you can't stop them now anyway, you can at least know who did it, and punish them afterwards.
- MHordecki 12y agoHow would you make sure this cryptographic identifier cannot be tampered with?
- deelowe 12y agoHuh? What makes you think criminals will be sure to use a drone with such an ID system? There are no unique parts to a drone. Other than the motor controller and motors, it's mostly cellphone parts. Motors and controller have several other applications.
- Drakim 12y agoDrones that fail to ID themselves will be shot down on sight.
- yeahsure 12y agoYou could always spoof the ID so that kinda defeats the purpose.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- drewbug 12y agoMaybe have each drone regularly broadcast their GPS's most recent NMEA sentence (latitude, longitude, timestamp, altitude, etc.) signed with their public key? That's what came up with after thinking about it for a bit. There's probably a better solution out there.
- Drakim 12y agoPretty sure we have solved this problem, since we use HTTPS
- baddox 12y agoThus guaranteeing that unregistered drones are dangerous.
- dzhiurgis 12y agoWho cares? Are you suggesting setting up an agency that monitors 'airspace' (I wouldn't call area 20 meters above ground an airspace)? I don't want my drone to be seen at the moment of crime anyway. Don't like drone in front of you? Accidentally throw a piece of string on it.
- jkaljundi 12y agoThat's like asking for every gun or knife to have a unique cryptographic identifier.
- dragonwriter 12y ago> Then, while you still won't be able to stop assassinations and such, just like you can't stop them now anyway, you can at least know who did it Even if you get criminals to comply as far as only operating drones with proper IDs, so that you can trace the legal purchase history of a drone, that doesn't mean you know who used the drone. Drones and their supporting control equipment can be stolen (and the owners prevented by force from reporting the theft) and people willing to commit assassination by drone certainly wouldn't be unwilling to commit theft, kidnapping, and/or murder of drone owners to acheive that.
- jjwiseman 12y agoThe FAA has just this week said that drones flying under a COA will be required to have an N-number: http://www.uasvision.com/2014/09/25/faa-issues-requirement-for-all-uas-to-show-aircraft-registration-number http://www.uasvision.com/2014/09/25/faa-issues-requirement-f...
- baddox 12y agoDo you expect to be able to regulate the electronics industry that tightly? You'd need some universal DRM system implemented in every accelerometer, GPS module, electric motor, and microcontroller.
- JoeAltmaier 12y agoThere's little to prevent construction of unlicensed drones. Like they say, make operating drones illegal, and only criminals will have drones. And they can be made simply with mail-order parts. Probably we're just going to have to get used to drones being around. Like we got used to cities and crowds on public streets and horseless carriages. This paranoia about drones will be seen by future historians as quaint.