5 ms·
A tarball is not a disk image and - in my view - is seriously shaky as evidence in a criminal trial. I had always imagined - apparently incorrectly - that evid
by lorddoig 12y ago
A tarball is not a disk image and - in my view - is seriously shaky as evidence in a criminal trial.
I had always imagined - apparently incorrectly - that evidence-gathering requirements in this area would have been more along the lines of imaging the disk bit-for-bit in a controlled, well documented procedure onto another disk which is immediately made read-only in hardware before being placed in the chain of custody. Copies provided in legal proceedings should be verifiably identical.
EDIT: Also not only is it insane that they didn't save the sniffed packets but for a one-shot, unreproducible event like the one the FBI describes they really should have preserved the local environment too. Any number of unknown browser/extension/proxy/system behaviours could have caused that captcha to appear on the screen once. Hell, if they only saw it in the viewport and not, say, the DOM source, it could even be a bug in the system graphics renderer - massively unlikely, yes, but I've seen weirder.
- TehCorwiz 12y agoThat was my concern as well. First thing I learned early on was that when you suspect that a server is compromised, or you you just deleted something super critical, is to dd it to an image and then mount it ro for forensics.
- opendais 12y agoAll computer evidence is basically Law Enforcement's word that it is real. It is really scary because of how simple planting things are in the context of a tarball or a log file.