3 ms·
> But people who can no longer spawn their genes are only conditionally valuable. And that value is assigned conditionally by... you? It's your belief that the
by Udo 12y ago
> But people who can no longer spawn their genes are only conditionally valuable.
And that value is assigned conditionally by... you? It's your belief that the value of human life is restricted to its immediate usefulness?
> The problem is, people are only really fertile for a tiny part of their life. Increasingly tiny. That's a problem for us.
Again, I was not aware that we had a population crisis.
- guard-of-terra 12y agoWe're talking about my views anyway, why would you ask that over and over? If you don't see this as a problem, you may just move along.
- Udo 12y agoI was asking because I was fascinated and curious.
- guard-of-terra 12y agoMy views don't have to conform to whatever constraints you expect them to. I'm just telling you what I really think.
- Udo 12y ago> My views don't have to conform to whatever constraints you expect them to. That's why I asked about your views "over and over", because I wanted to find out how your value system works. There is no need to get testy. It's true that I disagree, but this discussion happened mostly because I wanted to find out more, not because I wanted to display your views in a misleading light. Peace.
- guard-of-terra 12y agoI just failed to understand why you were surprised that in my views I assign value to people and not some external entity does. The opposite will be actually weird.