4 ms·
One of the biggest issues in the whole WebRTC process has been getting companies to commit to documenting the minimum SDP for interop. I'm curious how well the
by jmspring 12y ago
One of the biggest issues in the whole WebRTC process has been getting companies to commit to documenting the minimum SDP for interop. I'm curious how well these two implementations will interop. One of the reasons for ORTC is to remove signaling from the specification.
- pthatcherg 12y agoSignalling is already removed from the WebRTC API. ORTC doesn't change that. All would change is not needing to use SDP as the API surface. But that's API surface, not signalling.
- jmspring 12y agosignaling/api surface, easy enough for me to not be precise in my terminology, that said, there is still no agreement to produce an rfc/draft with agreed to sdp for an independent implementation.
- pthatcherg 12y agoI'm pretty sure this RFC draft qualifies as defining the SDP for an independent implementation: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-07#section-5.2 http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-rtcweb-jsep-07#section...