4 ms·
I've always said that anyone working on an electronic system really needs an oscilloscope. Without it, you are effectively blind and just guessing at what the s
by sliverstorm 12y ago
I've always said that anyone working on an electronic system really needs an oscilloscope. Without it, you are effectively blind and just guessing at what the signals on a PC board or on a wire look like. When I first started (a long time ago), those images were mostly transient.
Really? All the scopes I've ever used have had capture modes (although I have never used truly antique scopes). While I forget what the function is called, the scope would trigger on an edge, capture the waveform and freeze it on the screen. Now, this only ever fits a handful of bits (maybe 3-5 ASCII letters) onscreen, but it was really helpful for me. If you wanted to capture data in the middle of a long stream, you could use a second probe for the trigger, and in your code fire a single edge on a secondary pin right as you send the data you want to capture... lot of cool things you could do. Even the old analog scopes are amazingly powerful. I highly encourage anyone doing much scoping to do their best to master it.
But anyway, back to the subject at hand, I just thought I ought to point out to those who are getting into this sort of thing that Logic Analyzers exist for exactly this purpose.
- HeyLaughingBoy 12y agoCapture functionality was very expensive, and thus uncommon, until about 15 years ago. It was around that time that Tektronix came out with their low-end TDS200 model scopes starting at around $1,200. That was an amazingly low price at the time. My analog Tek 442 is probably about 25 years old and still going strong. I hardly consider it antique.
- sliverstorm 12y agoAh, excellent context. Most of the old scopes I used were at my University, which probably gave me warped perspective, as they were always able to afford the good equipment.