3 ms·
Whenever I see a piece like this, it makes me think I'm just oh so very slightly out of touch with how normal people interpret things. Take for instance: > Be
by lionhearted 17y ago
Whenever I see a piece like this, it makes me think I'm just oh so very slightly out of touch with how normal people interpret things. Take for instance:
> Be the best at what you do. Because the difference between #1 and #2 is growing wider in all the fields!
> (But what if you aren’t the best in your field? Read on…)
Growing wider in all fields! (But what if you're not the best?! Read on...!)
Now, I'm not poking fun at that style of writing - I'm genuinely curious, if anyone knows, why it seems to draw people in. Energy? Excitement? People's short attention spans? Very curious, any insight would be welcome.
- ankeshk 17y ago(Disclosure: I'm the author of the post in question) So why did I use the "Read on" tactic? Answer: To circumvent an objection. I felt that an objection would be raised after that story. So I added that sentence so people would read further stories without being turned off. Why do others use it? Couple of reasons: 1. It builds anticipation. And its a form of subtle encouragement. 2. It shows that the piece is incomplete. Which improves the % of people who end up reading the entire article. Similar tactics people use... good copywriters always end the page in the middle of a sentence - so people have to turn the page to know how the sentence ends. Magazines mention the page number right besides the headline on the cover itself. The purpose of all these tactics: prevent people to drop off in the middle of an article and get them to finish reading the entire piece!
- NathanKP 17y agoPersonally I felt that the article had too many exclamation points. Reading it was like having the author shout at me for a couple minutes. I don't know why it made it to the main page of HN. Dennis Rodman: Before & After. Black boring hair hid him in the pack. Red exciting hair made him rich and famous! Sounds like a TV hair dye commercial. lol I guess the article has useful advice on how to make yourself or your startup business stand out from the pack. But all things considered I don't think this article is particularly profound.
- philwelch 17y agoThe distance between Michael Jordan and Joe Klein isn't the difference between #1 and #2. It's the difference between #1 and #15 on a 5 man squad. I'd be totally happy being Scottie Pippen or even Horace Grant.