4 ms·
Yes, and it is a very sarcastic choice. The author implies that Arrington was just a totally arbitrary choice in the previous article, absolutely irrelevant to
by lliiffee 17y ago
Yes, and it is a very sarcastic choice. The author implies that Arrington was just a totally arbitrary choice in the previous article, absolutely irrelevant to his point, and this is more than a little disingenuous.