3 ms·
I expect it's because of who does the bargaining. In the US, where students take out loans and then pay educational institutions with that money, the student is
by akerl_ 12y ago
I expect it's because of who does the bargaining. In the US, where students take out loans and then pay educational institutions with that money, the student is the one bargaining. The student has very little leverage, comparatively, and they are not incentivized in the short term to drive a hard bargain because they're going to turn around and get the money via a loan.
When the government is directly covering the cost of education, they are the ones bargaining with educational institutions. If the institution tries to bump prices, the government can pull funding for that institution and basically eliminate their revenue. As such, the institutions and government are required to negotiate much more rationally.
- pedrosorio 12y agoAs I understand, in Finland universities are not private so there is no "negotiation between the state and the universities". Also, there is no tuition and students get stipends from the government while studying and can additionally take cheap loans if they need more income for their expenses. The question should not be "what is different between the systems?" but "what, if anything, is similar?".