3 ms·
Interesting article, but the images I'm getting are all extremely low quality. Tried both Chrome & FF. EDIT: Well, downvotes or not, I'd still like to know wha
by ggchappell 12y ago
Interesting article, but the images I'm getting are all extremely low quality. Tried both Chrome & FF.
EDIT: Well, downvotes or not, I'd still like to know what is going on. Here is a screenshot of part of my browser window while viewing the article.
https://imgur.com/IcEyM3R https://imgur.com/IcEyM3R
I assume others are getting higher quality images (?).
- ars 12y agoIt was fine for me, although the images were much delayed on loading, so there is some javascript acting there. Are you using noscript?
- ggchappell 12y ago> Are you using noscript? No. The only thing I explicitly block is flash. (Also, I don't recall having a problem like this before.)
- ars 12y agoWhat url do you have for the bad images? A good image url is: http://ichef.bbci.co.uk/wwfeatures/1280_720/images/live/p0/27/l1/p027l1df.jpg http://ichef.bbci.co.uk/wwfeatures/1280_720/images/live/p0/2...
- ggchappell 12y agoI get this: https://ichef.bbc.co.uk/wwfeatures/304_171/images/live/p0/27/l1/p027l1df.jpg https://ichef.bbc.co.uk/wwfeatures/304_171/images/live/p0/27... Probably this isn't worth a whole lot of work; I guess it thinks I'm on a phone (I'm not).
- ars 12y agoWhat's your user agent? Maybe you set it funny and forgot. http://www.useragentstring.com/ http://www.useragentstring.com/
- Pwntastic 12y agoAre you using ghostery? I was seeing something similar until I allowed Brightcove to load through ghostery
- ggchappell 12y agoNot using ghostery. > I was seeing something similar .... Well, then it isn't just me. Something about the BBC site's resolution handling is borked, I guess.