3 ms·
> The ability to go west was well understood and already successful by other Europeans by then, namely the various Norse colonizations. And our ability to go
by jimktrains2 12y ago
> The ability to go west was well understood and already successful by other Europeans by then, namely the various Norse colonizations.
And our ability to go to Mars isn't imaginary either (even if we haven't sent people).
Also, I've never seen literature claiming the Norse expeditions were very well known. (Not saying that doesn't exists, just that I haven't seen them.)
> SpaceX doesn't even have the ability to go. Comparing Columbus's low hanging fruit to Mars colonization is pretty unconvincing, especially on the economic front where colonization of the Americas was deeply profitable almost instantly, while Mars would be a welfare state.
It wasn't know that America would be profitable. Granted it was thought spice trade would be.
The point of the quote is that Europeans chose to take on an expensive exploratory endeavour (with the hope of a profit) even though they had issues at home.
- lutusp 12y ago> It wasn't know that America would be profitable. This is misleading, because the early explorers thought they were sailing to India, not to a new world that was unknown at the time. India was certainly regarded as profitable, and was the impetus for the early voyages. BTW this is why native Americans are called "indians".
- jimktrains2 12y agoThat was literally my next sentence, in the same paragraph.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]