4 ms·
While I wouldn't try to argue that there is no distinction between public and private, a huge amount of government money does flow into both. Private really ju
by geebee 12y ago
While I wouldn't try to argue that there is no distinction between public and private, a huge amount of government money does flow into both. Private really just mean that it is not operated by the government, and probably means that it doesn't receive direct operational funding from the government.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/27/universities-government-money_n_3165186.html http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/27/universities-govern...
Private universities do receive a huge amount of government funding, particularly where it comes to research grants. They are also tax exempt where it comes to endowment growth. These two elements do amount to considerable government support for research universities.
Some very high profile public research universities (such as UC Berkeley and UCSF) actually receive a small enough percentage of their budget from the state that they are tempted, now and then, to withdraw and privatize. This temptation is particularly strong at UCSF, which doesn't have undergraduates to support and might very well come out ahead if it gave up state support, already a minimal part of the budget, in exchange for the right to behave like a private institution.
- eli_gottlieb 12y ago> They are also tax exempt where it comes to endowment growth. And they're often exempt from property taxes too, which is why many elite universities now own substantial portions of whole towns or cities and charge rent to the actual tax-payers for use of the space. MIT and Harvard own much of Cambridge, and Columbia has been on a buying spree in Manhattan. According to the facts I've managed to find, they do pay some property tax, but they also seem to cut deals with their home cities to give reduced "payments in lieu of taxes" rather than pay their full property tax burdens -- depending on where. It ought be asked why tax-exempt nonprofit institutions receiving public funding for educational purposes can now act as landlords.