3 ms·
I would be just happy if the article would load properly. If they want to reduce smoking then tie government benefits to not smoking. Ban it within the militar
by Shivetya 12y ago
I would be just happy if the article would load properly.
If they want to reduce smoking then tie government benefits to not smoking. Ban it within the military; that they could do under the UCMJ. The for the rest, restrict where it can be sold and increase the taxation.
The cost has to become very high as even one hundred dollar monthly premiums on employee provided insurance do not stop people.
- DanBC 12y agoIncreased costs have some drawbacks. People spending money on tobacco are not spending that money on their children or paying their necessary household bills High cost tobacco encourages criminal gangs to produce and import counterfeit products or to smuggle regular product. Smoking is harmful, but smoking some of the counterfeit cigarettes smuggled into England is even worse. 2004: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4096911.stm http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4096911.stm 2012: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4096911.stm http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4096911.stm > One brand had eight times as much lead as normal cigarettes. > All contained higher levels of cadmium, which can severely damage the lungs and is linked with kidney disease. 2014: video http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/health-28940681 http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/health-28940681