4 ms·
> Just to prove that what happens is nothing but the truth. No, it isn't, except in the most myopic and unhelpful way possible. It would be the truth to measur
by ZoFreX 12y ago
> Just to prove that what happens is nothing but the truth.
No, it isn't, except in the most myopic and unhelpful way possible. It would be the truth to measure how much force is required and compare it to other phones on the market. It would be the truth to show that almost all phones bend when exposed to that kind of force.
It is not "the truth" to show a selective amount of the truth that allows people to keep believing a lie in order to sell papers, and I find it hard to sympathise with fake journalists losing privileges only afforded to legitimate members of the press.
- forgottenpass 12y agoYou sound a touch too salty to be judging what constitutes "legitimate" press.
- quchen 12y agoTo be fair, anything that's German and has "BILD" in its name cries out "tabloid".
- forgottenpass 12y agoSure, and I'm not trying to defend them, but pulling access over unfavorable coverage isn't the same as never providing it in the first place. We can argue the relative merits of different reasons to distance yourself from a publication, but unfavorable coverage (even unfair coverage) just seems childish and petty.