> It has everything to do with the very real, undebatable fact that ratios with smaller denominators are larger than ratios with larger denominators provided th

> It has everything to do with the very real, undebatable fact that ratios with smaller denominators are larger than ratios with larger denominators provided that the numerators are the same. Tautologies are true, and identities necessarily hold. You are saying that a single dollar is a larger portion of a smaller net worth than that of a larger net worth, I gather. Of course this is true. The relevance remains unclear. It's the next step that is treacherous.