4 ms·
I would also look at the MS DOS source code that microsoft released earlier this year. Here's a link to MSDOS 2.0 source: http://www.computerhistory.org/atchm/m
by theoutlander 12y ago
I would also look at the MS DOS source code that microsoft released earlier this year. Here's a link to MSDOS 2.0 source: http://www.computerhistory.org/atchm/microsoft-research-license-agreement-msdos-v1-1-v2-0/ http://www.computerhistory.org/atchm/microsoft-research-lice...
- sigjuice 12y agoLack of multitasking or virtual memory makes it not that interesting, IMHO.
- theoutlander 12y agoAgreed, but I like the simplicity when starting out since there's just so much. I'm reading Peter Norton's Assembly programming book from '87 to keep things super simple. (http://www.amazon.com/Peter-Nortons-Assembly-Language-Book/dp/0136619010/ref=la_B000ARBFXY_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1412188222&sr=1-1 http://www.amazon.com/Peter-Nortons-Assembly-Language-Book/d...) Do you have any recommendations?