Thanks a lot guys: I don't know what they heck you are so upset about: What I wrote is not facetious but genuinely complimentary to baddox. The baddox post

Thanks a lot guys: I don't know what they heck you are so upset about: What I wrote is not facetious but genuinely complimentary to baddox. The baddox post was good. How good? The thinking in that post seems to me to be better than the thinking in the book under discussion. And, moreover, much of the thinking of posts on this thread at HN seems to me to be better than what is in the books, and I said that. So, in comparison, the thinking in the book is not very good. And I read a chapter of the book, have read the corresponding VC Web site, and did get a call from the VC firm and talked for about an hour. Still, generally, the thinking in this thread is better. So, a question arises: How could the book and its author have done so well for themselves? I offered luck as one possible answer. And you are torqued at some of that?