I respectfully disagree. I find the title to be accurate to the question being posed. It doesn't feel that the article was about that direct incident so much as

I respectfully disagree. I find the title to be accurate to the question being posed. It doesn't feel that the article was about that direct incident so much as an exploration of the way we choose providers and whether something as vague as company's "morals" should and could drive those decisions. We're currently in a fascinating time where companies like AirBnb, Uber and others are innovating faster than the law can keep up. At some point it's up to us as a society to self regulate even if its just at an individual level.