> We have a system where wealth is accumulated. If that wealth goes in fewer and fewer hands then there is no economic freedom. Ah. You're using the word 'free

> We have a system where wealth is accumulated. If that wealth goes in fewer and fewer hands then there is no economic freedom. Ah. You're using the word 'freedom' to mean 'power'. This means you can raise the specter of power being concentrated in a few hands to advocate for concentrating power in a few (powerful politicians') hands, and at least it won't sound utterly ridiculous. Clever.