I'm not saying Aphyr's work isn't useful, it's the right tool for the job. For our needs and uses, it's been spectacular. I want to use Postgres, but it's HA i

I'm not saying Aphyr's work isn't useful, it's the right tool for the job. For our needs and uses, it's been spectacular. I want to use Postgres, but it's HA isn't something I'm willing to expose to my customers. So I'm actually using MongoDB in anger ... and it's doing spectacular. So let me leave off with our use case. We have few writes, little need for sharding (our largest customers run on a single node and keep the hot data in memory), we use acknowledged writes (MongoDB can be journaled you know), and our customers are willing to have three + nodes in an HA scenario. The HA is simple to configure. So far in three years we have no data loss. What more information can I provide to make up for the downvotes? As an aside, downvotes to me should be used for those that contribute nothing to a conversation. If you disagree with what someone says, state your disagreement so that we all, including me, can benefit from your better experience.