3 ms·
i think the key is to find something secure (and thus, "correct") and not doused with tons of portability goo (ifdefs, etc.) look at openssh, but the one in op
by there 17y ago
i think the key is to find something secure (and thus, "correct") and not doused with tons of portability goo (ifdefs, etc.)
look at openssh, but the one in openbsd's tree and not the portable branch. for that matter, any of the openbsd-developed daemons (openbgpd, openntpd, etc.) at http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.sbin/ http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.sbin/ or usr.bin/ssh for openssh.
any of the openwall projects are also small and easy to work with - http://www.openwall.com/ http://www.openwall.com/
- henryprecheur 17y agoSecure & correct programs don't always have a nice code. For example qmail is probably the most secure smtp server around. But the code is not easy to read. Pretty much all the stuff Dan Bernstein writes is secure and correct. But his coding style is just too weird for me and many others.
- there 17y agoyes, i avoided listing djb's stuff for that very reason.