4 ms·
Scott Aaronson has a bunch of well-cited papers related to quantum algorithms [1]. That merits you at least explaining how his explanation is not illuminating i
by Strilanc 12y ago
Scott Aaronson has a bunch of well-cited papers related to quantum algorithms [1]. That merits you at least explaining how his explanation is not illuminating instead of blankly asserting it. I know that I found it pretty illuminating when I ran into it the first time.
1: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=scott+aaronson+quantum+computing&btnG=&as_sdt=1%2C33&as_sdtp= http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&q=scott+aaronson+qua...
- philh 12y ago> That merits you at least explaining how his explanation is not illuminating I think that if someone could explain this, they probably wouldn't need the explanation. You can't ask "why don't you understand?" and expect to get a meaningful answer. (They might be able to point at a specific bit and say "you lost me here", but that's a what, not a how, and they might not be able to.)