4 ms·
How does it compare to TokuMX? I am a huge fan of PostgreSQL, but in order to avoid having to rewrite an application designed for Mongo, I tried TokuMX and was
by jedisct1 12y ago
How does it compare to TokuMX?
I am a huge fan of PostgreSQL, but in order to avoid having to rewrite an application designed for Mongo, I tried TokuMX and was pleasantly surprised by its performance.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- RyanZAG 12y agoGoing off [1] it looks like TokuMX is a similar multiple faster than Mongo than Postgre is from Mongo, so I'd guess Postgre and Toku would be fairly similar speed wise. Obviously depending on your data and search patterns one may still be significantly faster than the other as the usual caveat. [1] http://www.databasejournal.com/sqletc/tokumx-compared-to-mongodb-using-a-specific-common-use-case.html http://www.databasejournal.com/sqletc/tokumx-compared-to-mon...
- yangyang 12y agoNitpick: PostgreSQL, or Postgres for short. Never "Postgre".
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- tmcallaghan 12y agoPostgreSQL indexes are b-trees, and thus will suffer the same performance drop on insert/update/delete as all other b-tree based databases (InnoDB for example). I've been meaning to run the reported benchmark posted by EnterpriseDB myself, but haven't yet had the chance. My other concern with that benchmark is that it really doesn't cover much in the way of an interesting workload.