The dissent is totally acceptable if there were degrees or shades of opinion (i.e. is the policy acceptable or not, does it meet established requirements, is it

The dissent is totally acceptable if there were degrees or shades of opinion (i.e. is the policy acceptable or not, does it meet established requirements, is it being enforced). The issue is when she knowingly states as fact something that is not accurate (i.e. there is NO policy). That crosses the line into slander since it can cause reputational and financial harm to the institution being investigated. Even more importantly, by one regulator giving the appearance of "gunning" for Goldman it jeopardizes the work of countless others who also have findings and research that may actually be true.