3 ms·
As I mentioned in my other comment[1], I'm not 100% sure, but I think RedHat's patches for the 2nd vulnerability also cover this one. [1] https://news.ycombina
by dahjelle 12y ago
As I mentioned in my other comment[1], I'm not 100% sure, but I think RedHat's patches for the 2nd vulnerability also cover this one.
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8373320 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8373320
- rootbear 12y agoBut which behavior is correct? On Ubuntu, ls is redefined, but isn't that what a shell function is supposed to do? If Red Hat "fixed" this, then haven't they disabled a feature? Sorry, not trying to be obtuse...
- dahjelle 12y agoGood question, I don't know…but looks like mzs's comment answers us both. ;-)