2 ms·
It doesn't matter. If you find another shell that is vulnerable it's still a problem. Apparently it's only bash though. sh will run whatever is pointed by the
by muyuu 12y ago
It doesn't matter. If you find another shell that is vulnerable it's still a problem. Apparently it's only bash though.
sh will run whatever is pointed by the symlink. It's a good idea to try that than relying on bash being in its place and that an attacher hasn't masked it. Apache and other daemons will run sh, so that's what you want to try.
- yebyen 12y agoIn spite of all the good advice I've got about this vuln having come from HN, I feel like all of the time people are spending trying to produce the best snippet and correct each other (ourselves) to check for vulnerability is like one big circlejerk. I'm not sure who downvoted you, but I don't think you earned it. Every short piece of advice in each of these threads is likely to be part wrong, especially whenever taken out of context.