3 ms·
There was actually a bit of a social vision behind G+ Hangouts. The idea was that people would start "hanging out" in each other's web spaces, like dorm rooms.
by michaelochurch 12y ago
There was actually a bit of a social vision behind G+ Hangouts. The idea was that people would start "hanging out" in each other's web spaces, like dorm rooms.
I was skeptical of this but (as a Googler, and at the time, a drinker of the Kool-Aid) I wanted to see it work. Hence, my suggestion that (a) we re-orient G+ Games around high-quality games (such as German-style board games, 2D adventures and collaborative RPGs, etc.) instead of giving preferential treatment to Zyngarbage, and (b) integrate high-quality games (which we didn't have, but third-party developers will build them if you create the platform) with Hangouts. I knew people wouldn't "Hangout" just to watch Youtube videos (really, who wants to hear others' reactions to YT videos? the comments are horrific enough without having to hear associated voices) but I figured that a high-quality game experience around truly social games (not anti-social Zyngarbage that merely marketed itself through social networks, like Farmville back when Zynga was more obviously Facebook's Tapeworm) gave Hangouts a chance of looking more like that original vision. A high-quality and social German-style board game experience is one thing that would get a critical core of tech-savvy people using Hangouts for multiple hours per day.
Then... I was erroneously tagged as a union activist and my psychotic manager at the time had a field day with the "make 'im quit" game, but no need to say more on that. The Internet has had more than two lunches on that one.
It's interesting to see Google making this ambitious of a venture into games and the concept of a game. Augmented reality is an interesting field and it's admirable that they're trying this space out. Say what you will about Google (I've said plenty) but their ambition and commitment to R&D is a very good thing.
- GuiA 12y agoThe stuff that you suggest sounds amazing, and like it would actually make me want to use G+/Hangouts. Sadly, the percentage of the population who would be into that is probably single digit, and large companies rarely care about single digit niches :(
- michaelochurch 12y agoSadly, the percentage of the population who would be into that is probably single digit, and large companies rarely care about single digit niches :( I would argue that those single-digit percent niches can matter quite a bit. People follow the upscale. Facebook started at Harvard, branched out to the Ivies, then the top 100 colleges, and so on. At every step, it was associated with a higher level of prestige than what it was expanding into. If you start with cognitively upscale games, you get a core of highly intelligent people who love your product and will evangelize it. Through that, and by just having a great product, you move the rest. Games is a really hard space for Google to get because it emerged as the anti-Yahoo. Yahoos and AOLs and Facebooks want their users inside the walled garden spending as much time as they can. Google established itself by being the "we won't waste your time" search engine; its job is to get you where you want to go, as fast as it can. So Games were really a new thing for Google and G+ Games wasn't a fit for its traditional ideology, and that may explain why it made such bad decisions (and ultimately failed) in that space.
- illicium 12y ago> who wants to hear others' reactions to YT videos You'd be surprised. There are a LOT of "look at my reaction to some video" videos on YouTube.