3 ms·
Equally you could point to numerous systems not developed using any form of peer review and conclude the opposite. In the matter of fact there's probably more b
by acg 17y ago
Equally you could point to numerous systems not developed using any form of peer review and conclude the opposite. In the matter of fact there's probably more bad systems hacked together by solo programmers than there are written by communicative teams.
- jules 17y agoThere's probably more systems hacked together by solo programmers than there are written by communicative teams.
- acg 17y agoSystems that have no review of any kind are normally the ones that fail. Whether you are pairing or submitting to opensource where your code is checked, the quality goes up because things are checked. The more effective the communication the better the software. If two teams don't work well together, that is reflected in the software.