Yes, I did have a good reason: Our initial tests indicate that the organization is not vulnerable. To be fair to you and to me, I can understand your take on w

Yes, I did have a good reason: Our initial tests indicate that the organization is not vulnerable. To be fair to you and to me, I can understand your take on what I posted but what I posted was redacted to remove organization-identifying information. A better redaction would perhaps have been Our initial scans and appraisals are that our public-facing systems are likely not subject to shellshock.