4 ms·

Thanks for the feedback. I coudn't agree more with the remarks you made about the website. It defenately needs some improvements. > Regarding the watchfaces: a

by fla 12y ago

Thanks for the feedback. I coudn't agree more with the remarks you made about the website. It defenately needs some improvements. > Regarding the watchfaces: am I correct in seeing you're selling these for $100 per engine?! Yes. These watch faces (we call them virtual engines) are created by professional watch designers. > Do you expect to compete on any meaningful level with the iWatch and Android Wear? Or is this one of those 'premium' experiences that certain people are happy to pay for? No, because we are not a smart watch, simply an high-end digital watch. The product is premium by its materials and craftmanship. (For example: The Slyde is water resistant up to 30m). > So, all in all my feedback is this looks like a site trying to be premium without a clear understanding of what the word means. Point taken, there is defenately some things we have to improve with the communication. Thanks for you feedback!

notjustanymike 12y ago
Glad to give feedback on the site, but I have to call bullshit on the 'virtual engines'. "virtual engines" ... that's fantastic! If you simply called them 'watchfaces' you might have to give them away like your competitors. Charging $100 for a digital watchface is so amazingly brazen it could only be done if you had nothing but contempt for your customers intelligence. Or perhaps you're targeting the fools with more money than sense (such a wonderful market if you can get in it). Serious question though: how will you compete with the iWatch and MotoX? They have vastly more features and a hardware design at the very least on the same level. Combined with app ecosystems and a solid app distribution network, it's going to be a short amount of time before iWatch 'virtual engines' come out at a fraction of your price.

4 ms·

Thanks for the feedback. I coudn't agree more with the remarks you made about the website. It defenately needs some improvements. > Regarding the watchfaces: a

by fla 12y ago

notjustanymike 12y ago
Glad to give feedback on the site, but I have to call bullshit on the 'virtual engines'. "virtual engines" ... that's fantastic! If you simply called them 'watchfaces' you might have to give them away like your competitors. Charging $100 for a digital watchface is so amazingly brazen it could only be done if you had nothing but contempt for your customers intelligence. Or perhaps you're targeting the fools with more money than sense (such a wonderful market if you can get in it). Serious question though: how will you compete with the iWatch and MotoX? They have vastly more features and a hardware design at the very least on the same level. Combined with app ecosystems and a solid app distribution network, it's going to be a short amount of time before iWatch 'virtual engines' come out at a fraction of your price.