So I say: > ...it's exceedingly unlikely that the device did so while operating according to design. (Or Passtime is about to get one humongous fine and/or ju

So I say: > ...it's exceedingly unlikely that the device did so while operating according to design. (Or Passtime is about to get one humongous fine and/or judgement...) In other words, I'm saying that it might be defective, but it's unlikely (albeit possible) that the company is lying, due to the massive liability this would incur. And your response is to suggest that I'm saying it's literally impossible for it to be defective or for the company to be lying? In short: You replied to someone suggesting that the device might not be operating according to design by complaining that nobody is suggesting this. I don't believe you are discussing this in good faith.