3 ms·

Said in a simpler way: either Linux is poorly designed, or that amount of code is necessary for a general purpose kernel. This assumes that someone needs and a

by tensor 17y ago

Said in a simpler way: either Linux is poorly designed, or that amount of code is necessary for a general purpose kernel. This assumes that someone needs and actively maintains every feature in the code.

Tuna-Fish 17y ago
> either Linux is poorly designed I take offense at the statement "Linux is designed" :) Of course it is not optimal. Nothing else is either. How can we make it better?