>systemd has bugs, just like every other program, but by being so intermingled with the kernel, the consequences are much worse. WHAT? I thought systemd was fl

>systemd has bugs, just like every other program, but by being so intermingled with the kernel, the consequences are much worse. WHAT? I thought systemd was flawless by virtue of being the creation of god-emperor Poettering. /s >asserts that there are critical bugs that make the system unbootable >asserts that changes to systemd break everything >refuses to provide source Why should I look for data to support your assertions? If there is any data supporting your assertions you should know where to find it already.