> I do not personally find that argument compelling (and it is of identical structure to the above) Replacing "vulnerabilities" with "firearms" while retaining

> I do not personally find that argument compelling (and it is of identical structure to the above) Replacing "vulnerabilities" with "firearms" while retaining the same argument structure does not mean that both arguments are logically identical (a false equivalency). The implications of a free market for information security and a free market for firearms are totally different.