4 ms·
That doesn't sound right to me. "I just want to get rid of the whole project" sounds like a position of great strength in a negotiation. You might as well say "
by drostie 12y ago
That doesn't sound right to me. "I just want to get rid of the whole project" sounds like a position of great strength in a negotiation. You might as well say "I'm not signing anything unless I get X" and as long as X is less costly than hiring someone to duplicate your effort, you've got a deal.
My approach would look like "I know that I have a relatively stable job lined up and am facing less risk than you, which is why I'm willing to step down from 50/50 to 30/70 while signing this NDA, or 20/80 to sign a lesser agreement, like a non-compete which still allows me to reuse my code. I'm not accepting a 0/100 split because I don't have to; make me an offer which isn't insulting. Or pay me for the hours I put in. Either way." If that burns a bridge then I'm not sure that I would have wanted to save that business relationship. I'd think "Surely an MBA can understand that a dedicated employee who takes it upon himself to be more prepared than his boss at every meeting and who actually delivers the prototype should be compensated somehow."
- hga 12y agoIt sounds to me like the costs of continuing to deal with this person, along with the almost certain failure of the venture, makes "I just want to get rid of the whole project" equal "I never want to have any dealings with the person again". Better to have a clean and total separation and get on with his life vs. striving to have some fraction of nothing at a continuing time and energy cost (well, till the person gives up on the venture). ADDED: As oddevan puts it elsewhere in this discussion, he was "paid in sanity".