4 ms·
Upshot at the NYT did an article on checking fees through this lens recently: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/21/your-money/in-checking-accounts-the-less-you-ha
by runako 12y ago
Upshot at the NYT did an article on checking fees through this lens recently:
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/21/your-money/in-checking-accounts-the-less-you-have-the-more-you-may-pay.html?module=Search&mabReward=relbias%3Aw%2C%7B%221%22%3A%22RI%3A9%22%7D http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/21/your-money/in-checking-acc...
Not sure if it's paywalled, so the gist is that for relatively affluent folks, the annual cost of a checking account is ~$18. For the "cash-strapped" it's closer to $500.
Obviously that's just checking accounts, but I wouldn't be surprised to learn that many other things are more expensive for the poor as well.
- eitally 12y agoThat $18 is probably just the cost of checks, too. I have never paid for a checking account, but one of the reasons why is that the "free" stuff requires a minimum balance (Wachovia --> Wells Fargo) at a lot of banks. I have had an eTrade bank account since around 1997 when I signed up with Telebank, and have been very happy with them, too. They refund all ATM fees, and it's easy to keep it adequately funded via scheduled transfers from my primary bank (which conveniently also holds my mortgage), and since my employer uses eTrade to service its ESPP and Options programs, it's convenient to make trades there, too.