The license text itself is sufficiently complicated and multiply redundant it's hard to tell what it's trying to say. By multiply redundant I mean it tries to

The license text itself is sufficiently complicated and multiply redundant it's hard to tell what it's trying to say. By multiply redundant I mean it tries to say the same thing 3 or more times. The author/creator is incapable of seeing the problems this presents (let alone the terms of the license he's trying to get across); no matter how interested I might be in the language, this has turned out to be a show stopper. And, yeah, there's a no forking clause, subjectively judged; he's also has no interest in a test suite, he says there are already enough implementations of the language.