3 ms·
Python for readability. C for speed.
by mmphosis 12y ago
Python for readability. C for speed.
- jeffreyrogers 12y agoOne language I've been playing with lately is Lua. It's really nice how you can get it to interoperate with C code very easily. For applications that have well defined "hot loops" that need to run fast and where the rest of the code mainly exists for flow control, etc. Lua is really nice to use.
- Paul_S 12y agoHaskell for bragging rights.
- shaurz 12y agoRuby for hipster-cred.
- ch4s3 12y agoHardly. Most of the new ruby development I see is in boring SaaS apps, web scrapers, and now mundane medical software at places like Hopkins. Hardly hipster stuff.
- CMCDragonkai 12y agoIt's no longer hipster. It's mainstream. Although what are the new hipster languages now?
- cdnsteve 12y agoPython is also the most failure prone. " By contrast, the scripting languages tend to be the most failure prone of the lot; Python,in particular, is significantly more failure prone than every other language"
- Paddy3118 12y agoI've asked for more info on that so I can see what needs fixing and if these non-zero-exit values appear for me.
- kaoD 12y agoIt depends on what you're building. E.g. for GUI-heavy apps and fast development, I favor JavaScript (or any other flavor like Coffee/Clojure/TypeScript) + React. For execution speed and simple (or no) interface I'd choose Go, or if I could handle some platform instability I guess I would go for Rust (I still love C, but it feels like a dead weight for modern development).