4 ms·
I'm not exactly sure that you're unbiased in this discussion either. While the article may have been rushed, it didn't really seem unprofessional.
by CaveTech 12y ago
I'm not exactly sure that you're unbiased in this discussion either.
While the article may have been rushed, it didn't really seem unprofessional.
- devindotcom 12y agoWellll the headline is does describe them as a "laughingstock"
- smoyer 12y agoSome laughingstocks really are laughingstocks ... My only recollection of Clinkle before this article was that the name might not be taken seriously (perhaps during a discussion here on HN). Who declared them to be a laughingstock? Probably not those who invested - and I'm not going to second guess the VC talent that put up their money.