While the conclusion is true and has been for some time, the supporting data is insufficient. For example, the author doesn't even bother to gloss over key rel

While the conclusion is true and has been for some time, the supporting data is insufficient. For example, the author doesn't even bother to gloss over key reliability parameters such as data retention, which is primarily impacted by cycling. (By data retention, I mean the ability of drive to retain written data over a period of time, such as 6 months, since written. This is usually accelerated in testing by a bake cycle.) That said, it's a fun read and I'm glad there's more exposure on this topic.