3 ms·
Apparently that report is inaccurate: https://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/blog/2014/09/stanford-research-independent https://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/blog/2014/09/stanfo
by jimbograss 12y ago
Apparently that report is inaccurate: https://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/blog/2014/09/stanford-research-independent https://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/blog/2014/09/stanford-research...
Edit: not sure exactly why my comment was downvoted, the link I submitted is the response from Stanford CIS (the party who filed the legal document in question) disputing the article.
- gress 12y agoThe denial is only that they didn't make any promises to Google. Not that Google's interests weren't considered.
- jimbograss 12y agoHave you actually read any of the items?
- tptacek 12y agoOdd how the most important comment on the thread, which debunks the source article decisively, can somehow be at the bottom of the thread.
- TeMPOraL 12y agoIt happens every now and then; that's why I have a habit of scrolling through the entire thread, including skimming the greyed-out posts.